GRC and compliance platforms
You already sell AI governance and need the EU AI Act layer to be current rather than a snapshot someone pasted in last quarter.
Build your product on the record.
Watching your own compliance footprint is free and stays free. This page is for the other case: you want the EU AI Act record inside something you ship to your own customers. That is where a licence starts, and where we earn money.
Read this first
The dataset is published under CC BY 4.0. Commercial use with attribution is therefore already permitted, and we are not going to pretend otherwise in order to sell you a key. If attribution works for you and best effort is enough, take the open data and go. It is at aiactradar.com/data, free, no account.
A licence exists for what CC BY deliberately withholds: shipping without naming us, a schema that will not move under your feet, a freshness commitment you can put in your own SLA, warranty terms your procurement can accept, and someone who answers the phone.
What the licence adds
CC BY 4.0 against a licence.
| Capability | Open data, CC BY 4.0 | Commercial licence | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Use the data commercially | Yes, with attribution | Yes | CC BY 4.0 already allows this. We are not selling permission you already have. |
| Ship it without naming us | No | Yes | Attribution inside a customer-facing product is often not an option. |
| Schema changes | Whenever we change it | 90 days notice, versioned | A breaking field rename is a support incident on your side, not ours. |
| Freshness | Best effort | Contractual, with reporting | What we commit to is sweep cadence and time to publish, not that regulators publish on schedule. |
| Bulk and historical access | Capped export | Full record, incremental sync | Roughly 240 events back to 2023, with sources. |
| Warranty and liability | None, expressly disclaimed | Negotiated terms, DPA available | The usual blocker in procurement, and the honest reason licences exist. |
| Support | Community | Named contact | Direct line to the person who builds it. |
Who this is for
Legal and tax publishers
Your product needs dated obligations with primary sources, including the national implementation layer, without running an ingest pipeline yourself.
Certification and audit bodies
The standardisation track decides your work. You need harmonised standards and their Official Journal citations as they land.
Tooling built on MCP
Static AI Act checkers give confident answers about deadlines that moved. A live source fixes that without you tracking EUR-Lex.
What it costs
From €500 per month.
Billed annually through ligea GmbH, EU B2B reverse charge. The range runs to roughly €2,000 depending on scope: white-label, redistribution rights, response times and whether you need the historical record in bulk.
The honest comparison
The alternative is building it yourself. That is a source pipeline across thirteen official channels, an enrichment step, deduplication, the national layer in several languages, and permanent upkeep because regulators change their sites without warning. Call it two engineer months to a first version and a standing maintenance load after that. Our price is set against that number, not against a consumer subscription.
Next step
Tell us what you are building.
One mail with what you ship, which parts of the record you need and whether attribution is workable. You get a straight answer on fit and price, and a two-page agreement rather than a procurement marathon. If the open data covers your case, we will say that too.
[email protected] Before you write
- The open dataset, to see what you would license
- Which sources feed it, with cadence
- How changes are recorded
- How we compare to broader trackers
Informational content only, not legal advice. A licence covers the data and its delivery, not the legal correctness of your compliance decisions.